The Latin America and Caribbean Internet Governance Forum (LACIGF) is calling for session proposals for the 17th LACIGF 2024, which will be held in Santiago, Chile, on November 7 and 8, 2024.
The LACIGF is a regional initiative for multistakeholder dialogue on relevant Internet governance and digital policy issues. It has been held uninterruptedly since 2008, bringing together participants from across Latin America and the Caribbean.
LACIGF calls on the regional community to submit session proposals considering the criteria indicated in this call.
Dates (Update: August 16, 2024)
Proposal submission deadline | July 17 to August 21, 2024 |
Evaluation process | August 22 to September 20, 2024 |
Communication of results via email | September 20, 2024 |
Deadline for confirmation of panelists and participants | September 27, 2024 |
Proposals must meet the detailed requirements below and be fully submitted through the available form, which must be completed in its entirety.
Proposals should promote multistakeholder debate with the participation of the private sector, technical community, civil society, government, and academia on key Internet governance topics defined by the Latin American community in general and those addressed in national forums in particular. Proposals should promote diversity in their participants and approaches to capture the multiplicity of identities, views, and perspectives present in the region.
The types and times of each session are defined later in this call.
All physical infrastructure and audiovisual infrastructure necessary for the sessions will be provided by LACIGF, including sound equipment and room support. Only the main auditorium will have translation services; sessions in other auditoriums will be held in Spanish. Sessions will allow remote participation of panelists and facilitators via Zoom.
The topics selected in open consultation with the community for 2024 are:
The proposed session types for LACIGF are:
Roundtable: Moderated discussion where experts and participants debate a specific topic, promoting the exchange of opinions and perspectives equitably and collaboratively.
Practical Workshop: Interactive session focused on practical training and learning. Participants actively work on specific tasks or problems, guided by expert facilitators.
Expository Panel: Structured presentations where experts share their views on a specific topic. At the end of the presentations, a Q&A session with the audience follows.
Group Debate: Attendees are divided into groups to discuss and analyze a particular topic. Each group then shares its conclusions with the rest of the participants.
Lightning Session: Brief and dynamic presentations, usually 10 minutes each, on various relevant topics. Designed to convey information quickly and effectively.
Debate: Structured confrontation between two or more parties with opposing views on a topic. Specific rules are followed, and a moderator facilitates the exchange of arguments.
Otro: Unconventional discussion spaces that may include innovative or experimental formats designed to address specific topics creatively and participatively.
For each type of session, a minimum number of participants and a maximum duration are suggested, as indicated in the following table:
Note: For the sake of diversity, it is recommended that participants belong to two or more sectors.
Type of Session | Minimum Number of Expected Participants | Maximum Duration |
Roundtable | 2 experts, 1 moderator, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Practical Workshop | 1 facilitator, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Expository Panel | 4 speakers, 1 moderator, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Group Debate | 2 facilitators, 1 moderator, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Lightning Session | 1 presenter, 1 rapporteur | 10min |
Debate | 1 moderator, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Other | 1 participant, 1 rapporteur | 1:15h |
Participants are understood to be moderators, rapporteurs, speakers, facilitators, and experts participating in the session.
A minimum number of participants is defined depending on the session type. For multiple participants, it is recommended that they belong to two or more sectors (Private Sector, Technical Community, Civil Society, Government, Academia).
For the purposes of this call, the following sector descriptions apply:
For this call, session proposals must consider the following roles of moderator and rapporteur:
Session proposers are responsible for submitting a summarized report of the session within a maximum of 5 days after the event, in a format that will be communicated to the Rapporteurs.
The reports will be published on the LACIGF Portal. Failure to submit the report will prevent the proposer from participating in the next edition’s Session Proposal Call.
Session proposals must be concisely described, detail their objectives, clearly indicate the topic and its relevance to Internet governance and policy debates, and complete all fields of the submission form.
The Workshop Selection Committee (CST) is responsible for evaluating the proposals, with reference to the following criteria:
The CST will importantly consider the above criteria during the evaluation. However, for interesting proposals with potential improvements, adjustments may be requested during the evaluation period to consider their inclusion in the program.
We understand that the nature of session types is different, and therefore the criteria cannot be applied with the same level of relevance. Thus, the weighting of each criterion’s rating will be adjusted according to the type of session.
Special consideration will be given if the proposal originates from the IGF ecosystem, i.e. if it comes from an Intersessional Working Group (IWG) or a National or Thematic Internet Governance Initiative (NRIs) or other processes connected to the LACIGF
Learn about the Evaluation Mechanism in detail.
Other Considerations
When submitting your Session proposal do not forget to fill in all the required fields of the form and take into account the indications given in the Call for Proposals, as well as the parameters established in the Evaluation Mechanisms.
For any questions or comments, please write to contacto@eventos.lacigf.org
If my proposal’s participants lack sector or gender diversity, will the proposal be rejected?
A higher diversity rate is significantly valued but is not an elimination criterion. Gender parity is considered desirable.
Which groups are considered part of the Internet Governance ecosystem?
This refers to Inter-sessional Working Groups, national or thematic initiatives (NRIs), such as national Internet governance forums, YouthLACIGF, among others